Just back from a weekend in Cologne, where the extraordinary Joan Mitchell retrospective is currenly showing at the Ludwig Museum. I am still processing the experience of seeing so much of her work in one place, so more on that in the new year.
In the meantime, my impressions of Cologne. I know I normally have much to say, but I’m in a contemplative mood at year’s end, so I will simply post some of my images.
OK, so it’s not everyone’s idea of an
exotic mid-week break, and indeed, I was met with sniggers from a few friends
when I mentioned I was off for a jaunt around Birmingham with Vici. I trust
Vici implicitly when it comes to cities, as she is the great connoisseur of all
things urban – and she is a fan of Birmingham. Besides, I’d never been, and in
my nearly-thirty years of living in the UK, I’ve managed to visit most of the
other major English cities. It seemed odd that the one I’d missed is actually
closest to London, only an hour and a half by train.
I’ve always been attracted to ‘second’
cities (Antwerp is a good example – to my mind, far more interesting than
Brussels). Their charms are not as obvious as in the grander capitals, but they
are often edgier, friendlier, their architecture more challenging or unusual,
their history more evident (in that they haven’t had the finance or the
opportunity to modernise or ‘sanitise’ their public spaces). They are easier to
explore, or at least smaller – coming from the great sprawl of London, I
appreciate going to a city centre that fits on a single map.
But Birmingham gets a bad press. Perhaps
it’s down to its architectural history – some of the great (or terrible,
depending on your view) statements of brutalism have been erected there. The
Bullring is now a swanky shopping precinct, but in the seventies it was
notorious, the unfriendly face of urban planning. Even its name suggested
somewhere alien, thuggish and claustrophobic. What remains is the glorious Rotunda,
Birmingham’s diminutive version of the Shard – visible from just about anywhere
in the city; from the top floor it offers an incredible panoramic view.
Often second cities retain the character
that gets swept away in gentrification. Small industry has all but vanished
from the centre of London. I remember when I was eight or nine travelling with
my father through the darkened industrial spaces of Tooley Street, where there
were still warehouses and printers, and how properly Dickensian it felt to an American
child – and exciting. Those warehouses eventually made way for large-scale
tourist attractions, such as the London Dungeon, and Tooley Street is now like
most other roads in London, serving the consumer industry with the usual burger
restaurants and beauty salons, and branches of Tesco and M&S.
But as we wandered through Birmingham’s Jewellery Quarter, you could hear the rush and whirr of
machines making the pieces for sale in the area’s shops. These were real,
operational factories, unlike the factory buildings of the Docklands and
Shoreditch, now all luxury apartments. Gentrification is creeping here too, but
it still feels like the place has managed to hold onto much of what makes it interesting.
I was reminded of Roy Fisher,
Birmingham’s unofficial laureate, whose poems are both robust and beautiful at
the same time. Fisher says of Birmingham that it’s a ‘nowhere’ as far as the
rest of England is concerned, that ‘no-account bit in the middle’. Fisher talks
about the city, in all its nondescriptness, as a place which wasn’t spoken
about or written about when he was first becoming a poet. I’ve quoted Fisher
here before, as he is, to my mind, a poet who writes about the urban experience
like no one else. When he was writing his epic, ‘City’, Birmingham was in flux.
But I can still feel the pull of the old as I walk over the cobbled streets of
the Jewellery Quarter. Fisher writes:
Brick
dust in sunlight. That is what I see now in the city, a dry epic flavour, whose
air is human breath. A place of lines made straight with plumbline and trowel,
to desiccate and crumble in the sun and smoke. Blistered paint on cisterns and
girders, cracking to show the priming. Old men spit on the paving slabs, little
boys urinate; and the sun dries it as it dries out patches of damp on plaster
facings to leave misshapen stains. I look for things here that make old men and
dead men seem young. Things which have escaped, the landscapes of many
childhoods.
Wharves,
the oldest parts of factories, tarred gable ends rearing to take the sun over
lower roofs. Soot, sunlight, brick-dust; and the breath that tastes of them.
How amazing then to find a place like the
Coffin Works, a museum dedicated to the history of Newman Brothers Coffin
Furnishers, the last of a dozen coffin manufacturers to operate in the city (it
closed its doors in 1999). It’s an extraordinary feat of preservation, a love
song to a livelihood now finished, and to a way of commemoration which has also
passed.
Two exhibitions around town emphasised the
idea of memorialising / manufacturing. Fiona
Banner’s glass scaffold at Ikon is also a ghost, something that exists and
doesn’t, to paraphrase the artist. It suggests construction, but is nearly
invisible, so that we think of how things are built, but we stand in a gallery
that seems empty – we can see through the glass, into both the present of what
is made (the glass is transparent, but still solid) and the past of the empty
room.
Banner is also interested in cataloguing and assembling, and so her
entire collection of Jane’s All the World’s
Aircraft is stacked to form a column in the middle of the gallery, a precarious
tower.
At mac, the filmmaker Atom Egoyan has installed
Steenbeckett, a paean to celluloid.
Two thousand feet of 35mm film is spooled and looped through pulleys around a
darkened gallery, powered by an old Steenbeck editing machine. The film is Krapp’s Last Tape, in which Egoyan
directed John Hurt. We can hear his disembodied voice through the noise of the reels
passing through their elaborate mechanics. In another room is Krapp’s table,
where he sits processing his box of recordings. There is something beautiful in
the dusty technology, pre-smart phone. The ghostly echo of analogue.
In his
monologue, Krapp talks about ‘those things worth having when all the dust has
– when all my dust has settled’ and I think again of Fisher’s ‘brick
dust in sunlight.’
Listening on the radio this morning to
harrowing accounts from men detained at Guantanamo Bay brought back images from the
recent Michaël Borremans exhibition Black Mould (at David Zwirner in Mayfair).
I went to the private
view on a sultry summer evening; on entering the gallery I was immersed in
darkness. The normally white walls had been painted a greenish black, the tinge
of illness; against them, Borremans’s small paintings, figures against a
yellowy beige background, seemed to gleam. But that lightness became a burden –
a neutral, almost antique space in which the viewer felt something terrible was
about to happen. This was down to the figures themselves – the light background
drawing the eye into an even greater darkness – a series of hooded men (I say
‘men’ but the gender was indeterminate). Their black cloaks were based on a
Japanese Bunraku costume given to the artist, but
most powerfully evoked the cloaks worn by prisoners tortured and abused at Abu
Ghraib. I thought too of the KKK, the judge passing a sentence of death, the
prisoner heading for execution.
Even more chilling
was that the figures were not stationary in their robes, they were portrayed in
movement. It appeared they were dancing. Borremans’s title came from the name
of a band, Black Mold (the artist was listening to one of their albums as he
worked on the paintings). Their music is reminiscent of early Stooges, or the
Swans – lugubrious thrash punk. Once you have heard them, the terrible dance of
death makes more sense.
There was a play on
‘mold’, the idea of something regular that one must break out of, and ‘mould’,
a fungus dotting its spores of death over the surface of things. While these
figures were uniform in their uniforms, they were also subverting expectations
of their evil stance in their joyous dancing. They were at the same time
horrible and comic, that strange unsettling mixture that Borremans has often
captured in his work.
The paintings stay
with me, and creep up, as they did this morning. Haunting, yes, but the executioner
is having a laugh under his dark hood.
Readers will know that I have been
immersed in the fabulous Joseph Cornell show at the Royal Academy for the last
month, as I have been running a course called Containing the World in Words. With Cornell’s dream boxes crowding
my imagination, I took some time off to head to Venice for the Biennale (and
the Redentore festival, which falls conveniently near my birthday). I
discovered the city crammed with vitrines and glass cases of every description,
marvelous wunderkammers stuffed with incredible objects. Cornell had travelled
with me, and remains a guiding force for a new generation of artists concerned
with collecting such things that represent their age, and preserving them for
future generations.
Of course, Cornell is no stranger to
that city (or at least his works aren’t; he famously never travelled beyond New
York) as four of his magical boxes grace the mantelpieces in Peggy Guggenheim’s
palazzo. His fortune-telling parrot winks from its perch, and a ghostly palace
twinkles in mirrored gloom.
And over in another magical palace, the
Tre Oci (the neo-gothic fantasy conceived by the artist Mario de Maria), Mark
Dion presents several installations around the idea of taxonomy. Included is
one of his ‘cases’, filled with finds dredged from the canals and lagoon of
Venice. It resembles the heavy furnishings of the old-fashioned museum; Dion is
of my generation, so will recall being dragged to such places as a child,
institutions lined with great expanses of dark wood display cases, most of their
treasures behind doors and panels and inside drawers. What I love about Dion’s
cases is that they are thrown open, and so their contents are immediately
visible – the museum exploded. The stuff of the canal, just broken bits and
bobs, is presented as a rare find (just as Cornell made his dime-store
materials into precious and coveted objects).
Another element to Dion’s work is one
of ecological preservation. In this he is akin to herman de vries (who insists
on spelling his name in lower-case letters ‘to avoid hierarchy’), the artist
chosen to represent the Netherlands this year. Like Dion, de vries collected
objects from the lagoon and the city for his Biennale installations. His
background as a horticulturalist is evident in the series of framed plants and
flowers, like those you might find pressed in a book as keepsakes.
Unfortunately we were unable to get to the second part of his show, held on the
deserted island of Lazzaretto Vecchio, which housed a plague hospital in the
sixteenth century; there are known to be at least 1500 skeletons of plague
victims buried on the island. This must have been a very poignant experience,
as de vries work for me is concerned about the human mark on the land.
The human mark on the land is most
evident in Fiona Hall’s stunning installation for the Australian pavilion. Hall
plunges us into darkness, her museum cases dramatically spot lit, like the
theatrical presentation of the Renaissance Wunderkammers. But like de vries’s
meditation on death, present under the feet of those who make it out to
Lazzaretto Vecchio, Hall is telling us that humans may soon only exist as a
museum exhibition. Lining the walls around her elaborate displays are a number
of clocks, faces painted over with skulls, scythes, and other symbols of death.
Their ticking and chiming becomes an eerie reminder of our brief time on earth.
In the cases are the objects of human endeavor, such as atlases, but also
headlines that scream the truth of global warming, the destruction of the
natural environment. Standing in the centre of an octagon of cases, we too
become part of the ghastly installation. We too are museum pieces.
Which takes me back to Cornell, who, in
his temporary residence in London, has reminded me to find wonderment in even
the smallest tokens. So much of his work is also about time, and how, if we not
careful to preserve the past, the great achievements we might have made will
inevitably be lost.